vanderwal.net

August IndieWeb Movie Club Intro for Local Hero

I volunteered for the IndieWeb Movie Club - IndieWeb August 2025 slot as it was open with months following booked. I selected the 1983 film Local Hero (1983) — The Movie Database (TMDB) (PG–13), which has an ensemble cast of American actors and British and Scottish actors. It an interesting cross cultural set piece where a mid-tier executive from an American oil company gets sent to a small rural coastal town in Scotland.

There are some well known actors of the time and currently (with Peter Capaldi, who played one of the regenerations of Dr. Who). The film being more than 40 years old has held up relatively well with its humor, coziness, and charm. There are an abundance of themes to sink into, which also adds to the entertainment of watching and discussing the film.

Personally I’ve watched this movie a lot (between 15 to 20 times) and most watchings I’m still seeing something new that adds to the humor or understanding of the film. There are few wasted lines that don’t have a pay off later, either directly or subtilely. But, on a first watching it can hold its own just fine, even though it has been a long time since my first watching.

How to Participate in the IndieWeb Movie Club

To participate in the Movie Club, write a post about your thoughts on Local Hero and post it on your site by the end of the August 2025. Once you have it posted you may give me the link to your post in a few different ways: Email me, or send a note in the IndieWeb chat, or mention me (vanderwal) on mastodon.social or Bluesky.

I will take the IndieWeb inputs and provide a round-up at the end of August.

On the IndieWeb Movie Club - IndieWeb you can see past Movie Club monthly movies and the introductions and round-ups.

Local Related Resources

• Local Hero (1983) — The Movie Database (TMDB)
• Local Hero (film) - Wikipedia
• Local Hero (1983) - IMDb
• Local Hero - TheTVDB.com

Where to Watch

In the US Local Hero is listed on Tubi - Watch Local Hero (1983) - Free Movies | Tubi.

There are other options to watch for free, rent, or purchase:
- Local Hero - Just Watch

I hope you choose to participate and I look forward to your posts about Local Hero

IndieWeb Carnival - Totems

This is following the prompt - IndieWeb Carnival July 2025: Totems | Maxwell’s Realm, as set by Maxwell Joslyn. All interpretations of totems have come to mind from things I’ve kept in my pockets, a Swatch watch on my belt loop from high school through much of college, my dad’s watch, to a regular cap. But, growing up in the Pacific Northwest the idea that comes to mind when someone says “totem” are the native tribes of the Pacific Northwest’s totem poles and art.

As a young child living in the Seattle area and Portland there were not only totem poles around, but a lot of Totem poles - (Wikipedia) around and I enjoyed them and if we were traveling and there were totem poles around, we needed to go see them. I picked up a couple replicas for my book shelves as a kid and had them for a long time (I swore I still had them). But, it was not just the poles, it was Northwest Coast art - (Wikipedia) that also drew me in.

We would take regular trips each year to Vancouver, British Columbia, which meant even more totem poles and art. Stanley Park had is large totem pole, which we needed to visit, but as I found or more we needed to go see those as well. I could stand and look at them for a long time, but my parents didn’t have the same interest in staring at them and walking around them.

Once my family moved to Portland, Oregon the opportunities weren’t as prevalent to see the totem poles, but the art was all around. In my perspective the best thing about Portland was being close to Lelooska Foundation & Cultural Center – Living History Museum. Going to see Chief Lelooska and the Cultural Center for school trip and cub scout trips, and any other opportunity, was a perfect time in my book. Going to the long house celebrations with the stories and dancing, which came with explanations were fantastic.

This art and gathering called out the local salmon, ravens, hawks, orcas, and more in celebration and made each of them seem even more special. The sometimes world around you that can get overlooked by the day to day (even for kids) gets pulled into pure focus.

The Triplets of Bellville for IndieWeb Movie Club

This month’s IndieWeb Movie Club selection is The Triplets of Bellville that kicked off with Mark Sutherland’s introduction - IndieWeb Movie Club July 2025 - Triplets of Bellville - Mark Sutherland. For background:

• Letterboxd: (https://letterboxd.com/film/the-triplets-of-belleville/)
• IMDB: (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0286244/)
• TMDB: The Triplets of Belleville (2003) — The Movie Database (TMDB)
• TVDB: (https://www.thetvdb.com/movies/the-triplets-of-belleville)
• Wikipedia: (https://wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Triplets_of_Belleville)

A First Take of Triplets

I knew very little about The Triplets of Belleville going into the movie. I had watched the trailer and rented it. I knew it was a French animation movie with a connection to cycling and the Tour de France, but that is all I had going in.

A very short review would be: This is a modern French animation silent-ish movie that has a storyline akin to a fever dream. It was like watching Brazil with a different storyline, genre, and milieu, but French animation.

A Second Take of Triplets

As I was watching the first 10 to 15 minutes I would think I has a foundation for, “Oh, this is what the film is going to be”, but there seemed to be five or six potential paths. Throughout, what really stood out was the animation in a semi-sketch and water color with sepia tones and grays. Some animated films lean toward clean comfortable aesthetics with a illustrated tilt at reality, but not Triplets as its leans more to the surreal and exaggerated caricatures that would be quite believably done by the grandchildren or great-grandchildren of Honoré Daumier. The somewhat rough environmental sketches set the atmospherics for a story of a boy and his grandmother in just above squalid conditions. This is clearly not a Disney movie, but the dog (a main character) would fit nicely in a draft quality of Aristocats (but, oh Triplets is not going anywhere near Disney type conventions as a movie and that is incredibly clear in the opening moments).

The film starts with us watching the screen that the character is watching, but that isn’t fully clear at first. But, this theme of looking in through eyes watching something created to be watched reoccurs and has layers. There are solid threads of commentary on “watching cultures” that are heavily invested in entertainment, no mater the human cost. The animated time transitions are sometimes rough and like many other twists and jags of plots and themes. But, the absurdity and unexpected twists are a part of charm and fun. Everything has quirks that could be annoying in reality, but are endearing in this framing.

To say this is a cycling film, which is what Triplets seems to start out as, is like saying Die Hard is a work place drama. The young man on a bike and his grandmother training him from trike with a pulsating whistle, along with very rudimentary and Rube Goldberg contraption devices for training and recovery, with cycling posters, and hints at Le Tour de France around their home would set the stage for a quaint rags to riches American cycling heroics movie. But, this isn’t American, it is French (you know the country with Sartre, surrealism, and existentialism) and this film leans into the surreal and the absurd in interesting (you know, the good kind of interesting) ways.

The rags to riches cycling animated film at Le Tour, takes a strong zig with a sinister plot, that comes to fruition, around a kidnapping of cyclists. The young man is taken by the mob / mafia along with two others. This is now a absurdist crime thriller. But, the creators of Triplets are playing with a deck of cards with six or seven suits and each suit as different cards from the other suits. This is all done wonderfully.

The grandmother and her dog go chasing the amazingly surreal ship to a different and unknown land with a city. It takes a while for this to settle and sort out what has happened to her grandson. They are so near, and yet so far. It is about halfway through before the Triplets themselves become apparent. But, how all of this fits together or comes together isn’t clear. There are more zigs, zags, and jags that are all perfectly enjoyable in unusual ways.

One of the Triplets goes frog fishing with grenades, because, of course. But, beyond this it starts getting into odd spoilers. With no words we watch as the grandmother is taken in by the Triplets with her dog and run through a myriad of odd house rules.

There is an ending to this film that is rather reminiscent of Brazil, which may be a nod, or strongly pointing. But, there is a layering of screens and being watched and observed that echoes in Triplets. What is real and perceived or watched is a lingering theme. A map to Hollywood and tour guide that is uncovered a long the way are more than a hint that this is one of the social commentary threads to hold onto.

The dark characters of the mob / mafia are comically draw and large boxy figures, that adhere to each other and things. There are many characters and animations that are purely comical and absurd in wonderful ways. Most of the prominent eyes are behind glasses, other than the cyclists (it may take a rewatch to sort this out, but it started to be noticeable).

The Third Take of Triplets is a Wrap

The Triplets of Belleville has the feeling of a film with a lot of layers, like one of my favorites to rewatch, Local Hero where the first watching or two you realize there are a lot of layers and things going on to watch for. I have a feeling I may watch this again, at least once, and discover more.

This was a gem of a movie and one heck of a fever dream. I’m thankful Mark Sutherland selected it for the IndieWeb Movie Club - IndieWeb watch for July.

Gutting Book Basics

I continually think I have written about gutting books in the past, but have only mentioned it and alluded to it. When I bring it up I often get asked about and want to point to my explanation, as there are few resources elsewhere (there is one that surfaced in 2009 from Naomi Standen guiding her students How to gut a book).

My Background with Gutting Books

I took my last semester / term of undergrad in England in the tutorial system. I ran into “gutting books” in a lecture in the naught week leading into the term at the Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Oxford where it was pointed out that the tutorials with papers to be written each week, there would be more reading than there would be time. For each tutorial there would be required reading and ancillary reading that could be 800 to 1200 pages a week, for one tutorial. Many of us had more than one tutorial, so learning to gut books would be a very helpful practices.

Most tutorials are aimed at the student answering a question about a subject to fill in their gap of knowledge through teaching yourself and showing your understanding and the paper you write is the means to express that knowledge had been acquired. You then read the paper to the tutor and work through anything you many have missed and the paper may be marked by the tutor in more detail.

Gutting a Book

There are essential readings that need to be read closely, but if you are familiar with the subject you shouldn’t read what you know, but approach it looking for something new and / or contradictory to what you know and focus on that.

Then approach the related readings by focussing on what is relevant and what you don’t know. Using the table of contents and the index to get to the parts of a book you should or need to read is the primary focus. This can cut down a 500 page book into 40 to 90 pages or reading. Also focus on the book’s preface or introduction and skim the beginning of each of the chapters to get better context.

Pulling notes out of the readings and using multiple bookmarks to reference as you take notes, so you can do back and verify the passages as your are structuring your paper or writing.

Key Concepts

The key concepts are:

• Don’t read what you already know, but skim it looking for nuance and counter arguments or information that you may disagree with
• Use the table of content and index to focus your reading
• Read the preface and introductions (if there are any) as well as skim the beginnings of other chapters to look for shifts in context
• Read the chapter conclusions and look for changes in context, focus, and shifts in polarity (going form a great thinker to the conclusion alluding to the person being a hack or plagiarist – sort of shift, but also more nuanced)
• Find areas where you need to read more closely for better understanding

Naomi Standen’s Book Gutting Guide

For the last 15 years or so when somebody asked about where they could find out about gutting a books I would point them to Naomi Standen’s class guide for gutting books - How to gut a book. This has basically been the only resource that I’ve found that is the same practice as what I learned many years prior. I am a bit surprised that this page is still around and available and I’m deeply thankful that it is.

Naomi has a conclusion that I really appreciate:

My Writing Process with Obsidian

A few times lately my writing process has come up as it relies heavily on markdown for portability, longevity access, flexibility, and using the Shift Happened – Part 2: Small Apps Loosely Joined – Personal InfoCloud. The Small Apps Loosely Joined concept is something I use heavily for many things, but for writing the use of markdown I use the concept quite heavily.

Recently in a IndieWeb gathering, James who runs and writes James’ Coffee Blog shared his process and workflow for writing through to posting on his site, which was similar to my own process, but uses different tools along the way. He had something in his process he was looking to improve upon so I walked through my process.

My Process has Morphed Over the Years

My current writing process is an extension and evolution from my initial processes that trace back to college. But, it was in the late 1990s and early 2000s that my current process formed iterated upon. My early writing for blog posts and articles all start in markdown, which years back was well structured text and sometimes HTML for the structure.

My notes prior to formal blogging (started at the tail end of 2000) that I posted to my site were all hand coded HTML (or raw coding). If a note was going to turn into a blog post it quickly was marked up, and often as I was making the note or post.

Automate Early

One of the core elements I learned in the 1990s was to automate early for anything you can automate, use the tools you have at hand to help yourself be more productive. Most of my writing up through around 2010 was text and then quickly turned into HTML markup, as it is simple to do. But, the tough part is connecting related content, which is why I created my personal content management system (CMS) to run this vanderwal.net blog in 2000 and fully put it to use in 2001 (I used Blogger for a bit early on). Taking rote patterns and automating them was a great addition to help my process in 2000 to now.

In 2010 I shifted all of my note taking to markdown as moving across apps and devices made using other note making methods difficult to access and use. This shift to full markdown for notes, helped my writing move from notes to posts and articles much easier.

Markdown Workflow Process

Today and the last 5 years my notes start most often in Obsidian (and on mobile in Drafts, which is great for the good practice of get it out of your head and then sort out what to do with it). I have many notes flagged as “blogfodder” and track those through the writing process and moving them from a stub of an idea, to draft, not posted but ready, and posted (which includes a link to where it was posted). I’ll have another post about my new blogfodder process, which I’m really liking.

The writing starts as a note and gets fleshed out, if it is needed. If it is a short item I may stay in Obsidian and then grab and drag the markdown file in the Finder to the next step (I will get to this shortly).

Quite often I will leave Obsidian and from it click to open the Finder with the markdown file highlighted and then open that file in iA Writer - iA Writer, which is a nice focussed writing app for markdown, with additional capabilities. I often use the old journalism marker for needs attention (tk!) or “to correct” for things that need links, fact checks, or reference notes. Once I’m happy with the writing and structure in iA Writer (or Obsidian) I move to the next step.

Move to Prep for Posting

In years past I would take the markdown and quickly take the markdown structure and convert it to HTML markup by hand. Around 2013 or so I started scripting this transition, but the script was fussy. I’m not sure when, but it wasn’t long after this, I ran across Marked 2 - Marked 2. I think I started using Marked to convert markdown to PDFs and Word documents (for things that need to be sent out for formal article transformation in publications from Word). But, I realized Marked 2 had really good markdown to HTML conversion that was as good as my script, but not fussy. As I moved to Obsidian with properties in front matter and a footer with blogfodder tracking, it can remove all of that with ease, translate external links very nicely, and remove all backlink notation.

It is often in Marked 2 that I find markdown problems or the tk! marks. Marked 2 also includes some light grammar checking, which I appreciate and I’ll work through those suggestions. Then I flip to the HTML markup view and make edits, if needed, there.

Open My Blog Entry Form

Once I’m happy enough with the post I open my blog entry for for vanderwal.net or Personal InfoCloud and paste the HMTL into the form for the body of the post. On vanderwal.net I add in the title, location, type of post (these days everything is a weblog, but in the past it was more diverse), then select the related categories and submit it. Then I just to look at the post and review it again. If it needs an edit (up until July 5th) I would go into the database and make edits to the post there, but now have an edit process in my CMS (after 25 years, I figured it was about time). Once that is done, I go click to generate the RSS feed for the site, and send out alerts to services that share out links and summaries farther.

Wrap-up of the Workflow

This workflow is now done, except for seeing spelling errors or things not right and needing tweaks.

The process that starts in a markdown note, then progresses through to a more formal writing process and flow. I replaced a lot of manual steps that I didn’t think were difficult nor took a lot of time and automated the steps that do exactly what I had been doing with the same level of care, but saving time and reducing errors.

I don’t use AI in any of this writing process. I run across too much AI written content that is lifeless and doesn’t sound like the writer any longer. I’ve stopped reading many colleagues who used to have great ideas and a great personal voice, but are now just bland slop through the use of AI that tilts at, but doesn’t achieve mediocrity.

I have my own quirks and writing patterns, which I am fine with. I don’t write to impress, but to get honest ideas and understandings out. I blog and write to find connection with others of like or similar minds.

Strong Opinion About Slide Over on iPadOS

I should say up front, I’m deeply appreciative of Apple and all the products, OSes, services, and applications they make, as most everything is done with care and craft with and eye and understanding of detail. Having interactions with develop support and internal developers now and over the years, I’ve always been impressed in their focus on getting things right and doing thing better. Nearly every interaction with Apple from customer support, sales support, Apple’s developers, and people inside Apple has been fantastic and from people who aim to do their best and look to make really solid products and services for their customers.

Apple Announces the New ipadOS

At this month’s Apple WWDC 2025 they made the announcements about the new ipadOS 26, which seems like it may be a good step forward with the new windowed interface, that moves it into looking and acting much like a Mac. There are many other updates and improvements.

Subtraction of Productivity is Far from an Improvement

But… subtraction of one prime productivity advancement that the iPad has had for many of its iterations is that of Slide Over, which if you aren’t familiar (it seems Apple isn’t), is the ability to have an app that will slide in from the side of the screen and hover in a narrow mode, while the other app (or apps, as two apps on screen has been around for a while as well) is still in view.

This meant, with one flick and (in Steve Jobs’ parlance) boom! you have a note app (my strong preference has been for Drafts) that allows me to capture ideas in markdown quickly and then (or later) push the note out elsewhere - Twitter, Mastodon, note directories that Obsidian sits over, Messages, etc.) then flick it back out of the way. It is simple, quick, efficient, and productive, which is what Apple always seemed to put as a priority.

I often have Drafts and PCalc sitting one flick (two for PCalc for the second flick), which is ONE STEP to get a productivity app of my choice in place to divert my focus from a video I’m learning from, reading I’m wanting to capture a note or to do from, a quick calculation, or whatever I want to need at the ready and then get back to focussing. This is a super power that iPad has enabled. It is what separates an iPad apart from Mac and other devices in a big way.

The New ipadOS 26 is Four Large Steps Backward for One Element of Productivity

This new window model on ipadOS 26 is nice and could be helpful, but trying to do the same quick productivity action is at minimum four steps. That isn’t a productivity gain or enhancement. That is four large steps backward Apple. Four anti-productivity steps backward. If I wanted to lose productivity like that, I would switch to Windows.

The corner quick swipe from the corner of the iPad isn’t available unless I’m using the full window interface for finger use and only getting access to Apple Notes (a really nice product, but for various reasons isn’t my first choice, nor second choice). In the new interface the quick corner access is available with Pencil swipes. The full window interface you can add a finger swipe.

But, going from a window I’m working or learning in and want to get a Drafts up and ready, if I have it in my dock it is a tap to open, get it out of the way (often two moves for placement and then narrowing it, if not also adjusting the window I’m also using, and then typing in Drafts) and that is the quickest way. Spotlight is the other option, which adds a step.

It Is an iPad not A Mac

Apple, this device is the iPad it isn’t a Mac, it has special super powers, which include the ability to help focus and be productive. With this new ipadOS 26 new functionality and capabilities are added that are helpful, but don’t take away the iPad’s strength as well. It may be those leading iPad don’t live with it as a core device and don’t care about its strengths and super powers, or they don’t understand productivity so they slipped up.

The windowed world of ipadOS 26 could easily have Slide Over and keep the super power of one flick for productivity. I’m hoping the fall release of ipadOS 26 still includes the productivity super power that sets the iPad apart and allows its users to have super productivity powers that help set them apart with the partnership of Apple’s products helping them be their best.

2025 Vanderwal.net Backend Modernization is Done

A couple years ago I thought I would update the backend code from PHP 5.6 to PHP 7 and initial progress on it was hindered by time available.

Planning the Modernization Work

A few weeks back I started looking at it again and mapped it out properly like a project. I realized PHP 7 was deprecated and I should really head to PHP 8, so that target was set. I was planning on keeping things relatively simple using a database connection quite similar to what I had used, but digging through PHP 8 books and resources on O’Reilly Learning Platform everything was using a newer more flexible method. After digging further I took the route that would take a bit more work modifying existing code (some going back to 2000 and 2001). But, as I dug into the work I realized I was only needing to modify and modernize about 20% to 30% of code on the pages and templates.

In doing this I also realized my old method of security around the system management backend was no longer working, so it had to be rewritten as well. That meant rebuilding the backend screens. Those updates went live two days ago on the 19th.

With that done it was back to the last third or so of the pages and templates that are public facing. I had already reworked the category output pages and adding pagination to them. No longer will all 121 Folksonomy categorized posts show up on one screen, only 15 at a time will. The “Personal” category has 369 posts (it is a blog so it is about me, you see, but just not all of it).

The RSS feed received a very minor update to RSS 0.92 to keep in line with many of the OG methods that remain.

The Actual Homepage has been Restructured

The homepage for vanderwal.net has been restructured to make it easier to find information that isn’t directly in the blog and I get emails and DMs about somewhat regularly. Moving it to two columns helped this. I do need to modify this to flex or grid CSS model as tweaking the layout was rather tedious.

This Modernization was like Changing the Plumbing and Wiring in a Building

This modernization was like bringing the plumbing and wiring of a building up to new building code. The walls and structure are all pretty much the same. The top layer stays the same for now.

This modernization does allow me to hopefully finish setting up webmentions, which I’ve had partly wired since around 2021 or so. I just need the last piece to that to work. There are also other IndieWeb related updates I’m planning on making and have been waiting to get this code updated before modifying and adding them into place. By the way, if you are running your own site and/or blog, the IndieWeb community has a gem. There are a lot of resources in their wiki and pages helping anybody with their own site.

The pagination for the blog is likely going to change from a date with month focussed pagination to a page model with the oldest selection being page 1. The archive page will get a long over due update so it doesn’t stop at 2003 (looks at calendar, yep it is out of date). I’m hoping to have an archive page that shows activity, but also addresses the different post types (essay, journal, and weblog) that only lasted the first few years, but also around the 2014 code update and site move the entry type template went missing.

The category listings pages will also likely get an update and the category page may likely get some ease of moving through the posts over time, beyond general pagination.

Assistance with the Update

This being 2025 the question pops up if and how I was using generative AI as part of this. I was using Claude.ai from Anthropic with some initial questions, then I’d head to O’Reilly’s resources to validate them and learn what I needed to know (it had been about 10 years since I was knee deep into PHP). When coding and modernizing the pages and templates I’d and hit defects I’d run those past Claude to sort out what the issue may be (sometimes missing “;”, others the new query wrapper and parsing method caused me to miss something, or I had deprecated code I hadn’t converted). Claude would point out my errors and instruct me how to correct it. Sometimes it would offer a few options for approaches (some were not quite right and others were good and I needed to select a path - after verifying and learning about them further). It also would crank out code. I gave Claude instructions not to bother with large chunks of my pages and code, which it left alone.

I use Claude stand alone and used is Project function to keep things focussed. I fed it the outlines and high level task areas I have in GitHub and Obsidian and it was keeping track of what was accomplished and how the work met the goals. The most impressive thing, compared to other generative AI options is it was very strict with identifying things not viable in PHP 8 (and its iterative versions) as nothing else did this well. Claude also had the code of pages and templates I had worked on and would point out I was using a structure and method in other page and ask if I shouldn’t use that practice on the page I just fed it to sort out some defect I was working through. My code has had four or more iterations over the 25 years and my early coding wasn’t so hot and still remained. Claude helped my code get more consistent, not by it fixing it, but pointing out I had something good and modern and I should keep consistent with that. By the last couple of templates I didn’t need to have Claude check them as they worked with my own editing, but I still fed them in as it seems to help improve suggestions and catching lack of consistency of my own doing.

A year ago I tried this with OpenAI and its ChatGPT and it was a hot mess. It couldn’t keep PHP versions correct. I try it with every update and I find it really problematic and what it outputs (code and other attempts) as nothing better than mediocre and often not correct.

IDE Use

In the last 10 to 15 years the IDE I’ve used to code and work on vanderwal.net has been from Panic and either Coda or now Nova, which have worked well. I have kept a good firewall between AI assistance and the IDE. I don’t mind type ahead suggestions. But, finding deprecated code to address was something I was going to need. Some friends suggested I try PhpStorm by JetBrains, which seemed good as I’ve used PyCharm a few times in the past and really enjoyed it. I knew I didn’t want VS Code near this, as I’ve pretty much had it with VS Code (I mostly use it with Python for data analytics) due to plug-in issues and lack of ease keeping projects separated.

I picked-up a trial of PHPStorm and after a day or so I had the hang of a good portion of what I needed to do. My favorite part is the setting the exact version of PHP you are working with. It highlights where there are errors and problems. In the last couple of days as I finally was getting the hang of PHP 8 and the methods I was regularly using PHPStorm was helping with type ahead suggestions (there were a few times where I accidentally triggered them when I didn’t want them and nearly turned of that functionality - control Z is your friend). PHPStorm also can make use of GitHub CoPilot, which I don’t find helpful with OpenAI connected to it, but is better with Claude Sonnet. The downside with CoPilot is it doesn’t have access to the Project space in Claude I’ve been working with and therefore its suggestions are less on target - CoPilot with Claude is light years better for PHP than OpenAI offerings). Essentially I didn’t use the incorporated genAI functionality and I was very happy with that setup.

Posting Ease

One of the things I’m looking forward to are slightly better methods for posting to this site and managing posts. Many of the steps beyond creating and posting are manual steps, like kicking off creation of the RSS feed (I do that after a quick review of the created post as it is live, I kick the RSS feed after that review). The alerting the media, or the alerts beyond basic RSS, is also a manual step done after that review. I may automate the combination of those two kicks after a review.

Modernization Test

Just a test of the modernized update to PHP 8.3 for the system management tools.

Tomorrowland IndieWeb Movie Club Review

The IndieWeb Movie Club - IndieWeb this month has Tomorrowland (2015) — The Movie Database (TMDB) as its focus this month, which was suggested by Tantek - May 2025 IndieWeb Movie Club.

Review of Tomorrowland

I finally watched the whole of Tomorrowland. My son had strongly recommended Tomorrowland after he saw it when it first came out, saying, “this is a movie you will love”. About two or three years ago I started watching it too late one evening and was about 45 minutes in and put it on hold, but didn’t get back to it.

Rather than starting where I left off, I started all over from the beginning. I didn’t remember much from my prior watching, but watching it from the start I had the same feeling and thoughts of, “this isn’t going where I thought it would go”. I had this thought a lot. The movie is largely had non-linear chronology in many spots and plays with time concepts, which is something I deeply enjoy.

Given it is 10 years beyond release, I’m not worrying about spoilers (in River Song voice or not). Much of the movie is working through crossing time and timelines from current storyline to one future timeline. The future, Tomorrowland, is a glimpse of the future created to show the possible optimistic outcome. Athena (Raffey Cassidy) is a young human-skinned bot who traverses Tomorrowland’s timeline and space to bring people in to help it become reality, but also save it. Hence, our two main characters, Frank Walker Geoge Clooney) and Casey Newton (Britt Robertson). Frank is the jaded and pessimistic creator who is back in our timeline under agreement to stay there. Casey is new to the Tomorrowland experience from her “gifted” token.

The movie leans into the Two Wolves - Wikipedia legend and storytelling device where the white wolf is positive and optimistic and the black wolf is negative and pessimistic and the one that wins is the one you feed. I felt this worked well and was a good underlying story driver.

Much of the movie was quite good, but some transitions were a bit bumpy. But, that may be intentional as much of the focus is on Casey and her perspective and at many key points she doesn’t have any understanding of what is going on, what the hole journey she is on is about, and also lacking context to have a foothold to understand what is going on. The only character that didn’t really seem fully fleshed out was the possibly evil David Nix (Hugh Laurie).

From a first watch perspective the bumpy path of the journey was a good framing and means of pulling the audience into the characters understand of what is happening.

The Wrap-up

I quite enjoyed Tomorrowland and my son’s estimate was pretty dead on. I really enjoy plays on time, timelines, and reality and this ticked the boxes well. The story was good and pulled the viewer along. The acting was good and cinematography and editing supported the time settings and moods along the storyline.

I would / will watch this again, but that will be a very different perspective. To give it a rating I’d put it at or just under 8 out of 10. It isn’t perfect nor did it put me in awe at any point, but it was quite enjoyable, ticked boxes for story focus I enjoy, and there are spots and perspectives I may be thinking about for a while.

A Blog Move and Thin Catch-up

Yah, I know. It has been a while. Some things have changed, as I’m searching for what is next on the work front. Where I was it was a bit restrictive on sharing outward, so things got a little quiet. I’m still working on the Social Lenses / Complexity Lenses and have 80 to 90 stubs of ideas in my backlog of blogfodder, for here or the Personal InfoCloud.

A Move of Personal InfoCloud

I hadn’t posted to my blog, Personal InfoCloud in a long while. I was in the midst of a 16 part “Shift Happened” series, which was hitting embracing complexity as the next part of the series. I’m not sure if or when I will return to that. But, my work agreement frowned on sharing things out and I had a long negotiation about my prior work and corpus of IP around the Complexity Lenses. But, now that I’m back and able to freely write and share again I realized my blog where that happened much of the time needed to move off SquareSpace. Why? Poor customer support and small things breaking and them blaming me, when I hadn’t touched it in years.

The last two plus months I focussed on the move out and into another platform. I had looked at a few options for a month or so prior, but SquareSpace had one easy export path out, which is to WordPress, which I could self host (I have a few small blogs and sites that I have on self-hosted WP and they are fine). While there is a lot of turmoil in the WordPress sphere, going with the self-hosted option seems viable as a transition, if not longer option. I did an export of my SquareSpace site and in 20 minutes of export I had all my posts in WP and all comments, tags / categories, most media in blog posts, and the structure was there.

While the first step was 20 minutes to get to about 80 percent of a move done, the next portion took about two months between many meetings around advisory to start-ups, discussions about next steps (everybody was holding out until after the election, then to sort out what level of chaos may ensue, now…, and finding a lot of interest it is just getting things to a reality), mentoring professionally to director and up leadership in product management and cross-functional design and development engineering (with a lot of data focus and AI), data analytics and analysis of my own 20+ years of what I know so it can be better organized for others to pick-up. But, I had a deadline of the first week of February for the move out of SquareSpace to take place, as it was the next billing cycle.

The last two months of the move of the blog focussed on getting the design transitioned over or finding a viable design theme to use and bend to something I could work with. I found something, but it came with a lot of options and capabilities, which I initially embraced, then started printing out screens to single screen PDFs and taking the red pen to them (even after the move I think there are some things that may go, but also things that need work to come back). The next big haul was touching every post fixing some media links broken and fixing the URLs, which included the pre-post name date slug as part of the post name. I got those finally sorted out at the end of last week and Thursday I started moving the domains (from where I was developing it in a sandbox), shift to the production site, adding certificates, fixing odd typography issues, fixing routing issues, and other oddities. I hit the deadline.

Move Done and Next Steps for PIC

With the move done, I didn’t realize how much stress and mental clutter I had tied up in that move. I was managing todo lists in Obsidian, GitHub, and some quick reminders with times and dates on them. I felt free to start thinking about what I was focussing on two months prior and a ton of pressure released.

With the Personal InfoCloud blog I still need to fix links that go to Slideshare as most are broken, but I need to sort out what I want to do with those presentations. Jon and Rashmi have started a new replacement for Slideshare as a modern attempt, which I need to try a bit more and assess the fit for needs.

I also need to sort out the homepage of the site, as I’ve long wanted to have a homepage that sits in front of the blogs. I have that now, but I’m not happy with it. With the deadline out of the way I can have it as one of my projects I’m working through.

The categories, post listing, and search is also something I need to re-think and get into a better state. When I moved from TypePad to SquareSpace in 2011 to 2012 there wasn’t a good way to manage this, and what I cobbled together I hated. But, for PIC the platform is something I don’t want to think about I just want to use to post things I write. WordPress has a lot more options and I played with a couple before I put a hard focus on making the deadline about 5 to 6 weeks ago.

I have quite a few blog posts ready to be written. An introduction to the Complexity Lenses (there are over 90 of them now and in my master outline of them with sub-nodes there are over 1,500 nodes all together, which each node capable of being a page to at least 5 pages of explanation). This introduction post may iterate over time, which I’m fine with and not true blog with a line in time tied to it that other posts have. I also need to write up my “20 Social Roles”, which I do a lot of work around helping organizations sort through the roles and dynamics of their work, collaborating, cooperative, and collective environments, but also tool and platform builders creating tools that close the gaps of missing support for any and all of these Social Roles.

What Happens Here?

Here at vanderwal.net I need to get back to building a habit of blogging again. The weeknote is something I may do to help my rhythm. I still write a ton, but it is all in my notes. My daily notes, or “Daily Dump”, looks an awful lot like my first 4 to 7 years of blogging here (so 2000 to 2007 / 2008), before short snippets and observations started ending up in Twitter.

I still need to spend a week of heads down work to update the underlying code that the site runs on. I started that about 2 years back, but a day or two here and there weren’t cutting it and not a good way to make progress, particularly since it requires rewriting the code on my many templates to get data out and filling the pages in. Once that is done I have a few things I really want to address, like pagination on tag pages, and fixing the flow of the blog across time.

Whew!

If you have interest in chatting and catching up, or if you have a project, product, or work you would like help with please reach out.

Take care.